Beaver County Courthouse / photo by John Paul

A local judge has dismissed a whistleblower lawsuit filed against the Board of Commissioners by the county’s former Purchasing Director.

Beaver County President Judge John D. McBride dismissed a lawsuit filed by Mary Anne Ruskin alleging she was terminated from her position because she raised questions about the process Sheriff George David used to order uniforms, and because she testified against David before a Statewide Investigating Grand Jury.

Judge McBridge ruled there was no direct evidence of correlation between Mary Anne Ruskin’s complaint and subsequent testimony against Sheriff David and the County Commissioners deciding to eliminate her position. He also ruled that her arguments attempting to show a casual connection between the two events were all without merit.

President Judge McBride determined that: Sheriff David’s arrest was for charges “unrelated to the uniform bid issue that [Ruskin] was involved in,” that the Sheriff’s arrest “bears no relationship to the actions of the Beaver County Board of Commissioners and their decision-making process,” that any “verbal altercation with the Sheriff has no relationship to the Board of Commissioners,” and that “it is prudent to trim the fat from the County budget whenever and wherever it is possible to do so. It is clear that the [County Commissioners’] justification of cost savings for the termination of [Mary Anne Ruskin] was not merely pretext.”

Although Judge McBride chose to preside over Mary Anne Ruskin’s whistleblower lawsuit against the County Commissioners, he had previously recused the entire local bench from hearing other cases involving the Board or Sheriff George David citing conflicts of interest. Judge McBride issued a recusal order in the case of County Board of Commissioners v Myron Sainovich which read in part: “Because this Court relies upon maintaining its past and present good relationship with the County Board of Commissioners for funding of the Judicial Branch of government, it is necessary for this Court to recuse itself from this case.”

Mary Anne Ruskin had no comment when asked by the Beaver Countian if she intended to appeal Judge McBride’s ruling, saying she had not yet consulted with her attorney about the decision. Ruskin is being represented by the Pittsburgh law firm of Rothman Gordon.

Read President Judge John D. McBride’s entire opinion.

Read Also:
Former Purchasing Director Files Lawsuit Against Beaver County Over Sheriff David
Mediator Says Dismiss Complaint Against Sheriff – Woman Claims Shenanigans

John Paul
John Paul is the founder of the Beaver Countian. He reports full-time for the site, specializing in investigative journalism with an emphasis on public corruption.

Reader Comments

Photo and Image Files
Audio and Video Files
Other File Types
10 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
Mungo JerryweisserwolfYour Name (Required):Nobamawtf Recent comment authors
newest oldest top voted
Notify of

Doesn’t surprise me at all..Unfreakin’ believeable!!!


Unreal. Of course it was related. These judges need to go too.

Da Judge
Da Judge

There’s an old joke about what judges have underneath their robes. We now know the answer in Beaver County is George David.


“Plaintiff relies on alleged inferred connection to find causation.” Well, once again, no smoking gun, but it is obvious to many that she is correct in her allegations. If this kind of rigor were applied to the continual lying of the Defendant, there would be no opportunity for him to schedule another Not Guilty Party. Welcome to another Mickey Mouse Club “Nothing Happened Day.”


I attended this hearing. The attorneys presented the case, back and forth, and the Judge raised some very intriguing legal points and questions. You had to be there and hear the whole argument to wrap your head around it. READ the Judge’s opinion. What I find amazing is that this is how the lawyers and the judge actually TALKED. After a while I was like, What’d he say??!!

I’m no lawyer, but in MY opinion, even though George David was not involved in the specific legalities of this case, his specter was lurking in the background. Kinda like the Wizard of Oz, “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain”.